Skip to main content

Quality Management System

Integration of UDI in the Quality Management System (QMS)

Amongst the applicable MDR/IVDR provisions to be included in the QMS of the manufacturer is Article 10(9)(h)/Article 10(8)(h):

"...verification of the UDI assignments made in accordance with Article 27(3)/24(3) to all relevant devices and ensuring consistency and validity of information provided in accordance with Article 29/26".

When implementing the requirements of the MDR/IVDR related to the QMS, manufacturers should therefore consider how the UDI system and obligations can also be integrated.

UDI (composed of the UDI-DI and UDI-PI) and Basic UDI-DI assignment, and management of the UDI-related information can impact many other lifecycle QMS processes. The manufacturer could establish a UDI implementation plan and use appropriate implementation tools as described in its QMS to allow correct assessment/decisions to be made and the proper documented evidence to be created, to ensure compliance with the Regulations regarding the UDI system. Elements of such a plan may include:

  1. Analysis of expectations and needs of different stakeholders such as economic operators, healthcare institutions/professionals, patients/users, insurance providers.

  2. Analysis of the relevant issuing entities’ standards.

  3. Choice of a designated issuing entity.

  4. Definition of internal responsibilities for the implementation and subsequent management of the project plan.

  5. Management and, if necessary, updates of the project plan implementation.

  6. Description of methods and use cases, by which the proper running and continuous compliance of UDI-related QMS processes can be verified.

The manufacturer may also assess the applicable UDI responsibilities when determining and documenting external roles (e.g. third party suppliers, authorised representative, importers, distributors, system or procedure packs producers).

Auditing the implementation of the UDI system

The Notified Body should ensure that its personnel involved in auditing the UDI requirements, as defined by the regulations, have the knowledge of these requirements. The documented assessment procedures should clearly outline the topics regarding the UDI system that needs to be covered by the auditors.

All applicable requirements of the UDI system are part of the processes that are audited by the Notified Body. Those processes include but are not limited to the following aspects:

  • Selection of an issuing entity for the UDI codes

  • Structure of the UDI-DI system (e.g. granularity of the Basic UDI-DI, grouping of UDI-DI)

  • Assignment of the UDI-DI codes

  • Definition of UDI-PI and applicability to the product types

  • Registration process into the UDI database

  • Record-keeping procedures

  • Issuing the EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC) with the Basic UDI-DI

  • Change management of the UDI system, including update of the database

  • Labelling process, including barcode reference code and software validation

  • Maintenance of printing equipment

  • Training of personnel on UDI system

  • Processes used in post market surveillance and other monitoring activities

In order to ensure that the UDI System meets the requirements, it is recommended that the Notified Body considers the elements listed above when assessing the quality system of the manufacturer.

Sections to be considered in the UDI’s QMS

The following sections must be considered when integrating the UDI obligations in the different areas of the QMS.

Design and Development

According to Article 27 (3) MDR and Article 24 (3) IVDR, before placing a device on the Union market, other than a custom-made, investigational or performance study device, the manufacturer shall assign to the device and, if applicable, to all higher levels of packaging, a UDI created in compliance with the rules of the issuing entities designated by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 2 of the above-mentioned Articles.

Moreover, according to Article 29 MDR and 26 IVDR, before placing a device on the market, other than a custom-made device, or a system or procedure pack, the manufacturer or producer shall assign a Basic UDI-DI. For devices that are subject to a conformity assessment, the assignment of a Basic UDI-DI shall be done before the manufacturer applies to a notified body for that assessment.

Manufacturers should consider the objectives and anticipated effects of the UDI system when designing and developing products. The manufacturer should assure assignment of UDI-DIs prior to placing a device on the market or submitting a Technical Documentation to a notified body for conformity assessment, by using the rules of the issuing entities. In addition, the UDI-PI should properly replicate the production identifiers per MDR/IVDR Annex VI, Part C, 3.5 and 6 respectively, which have been assigned to a device label based on risk management or regulatory requirement.

In addition to traceability, the appropriate level of product serialisation should also be done on the basis of proper risk management, consideration of regulatory requirements (e.g. active implants require serial numbers) and expectations or requirements of other stakeholders/national regulators such as registries.

Procedures used for the assignment of UDI, the change of UDI and the corresponding degree of traceability (grouping of devices under a Basic UDI-DI or definition of their UDI-PI) should be appropriately documented.

Product documentation and retention

As part of the technical documentation, the manufacturer shall keep up-to-date a list of all UDIs (UDI-DIs and UDI-PIs) that it has assigned (Article 27(7) MDR, Article 24(7) IVDR). According to Article 10(8) MDR and Article 10(7) IVDR, manufacturers shall keep the technical documentation available for the competent authorities for a period of at least ten years after the last device covered by the EU declaration of conformity has been placed on the Union market. In the case of implantable devices, the period shall be at least 15 years after the last device has been placed on the Union market.

Production and process

Manufacturers may consider using the UDI, from the outset of the production phase to ensure the effective product information management. For example, the UDI-DI may be used as reference or catalogue number.

The manufacturer should decide for each individual type/model when, where, and how the UDI carrier should be applied following various timelines per risk class, as required by the MDR/IVDR.

As the UDI carrier may have an impact on manufacturing processes, in case of directly marked devices, it should be determined in advance if any exemptions in accordance with Point 4.10, Part C of Annex VI apply, to ensure that the requirements are fulfilled at the time the device is placed on the Union market. For example, there are exemptions under MDR/IVDR as regards direct marking, in case it cannot be performed on certain devices. Such exemptions should be documented, preferably in the technical documentation.

In addition, device package levels will need to have the UDI carrier.

Some labelling considerations:

  • Manufacturers should ensure that, as part of their quality management system, the label printing process is verified and validated, and the equipment is used and maintained in accordance with relevant procedures

  • Changes to validated processes need to be assessed for impact on device labelling

  • The software used in implementing the UDI system (e.g. UDI labelling of devices and packaging, machine-to-machine automatic upload of UDI data to EUDAMED) should remain in a validated state in accordance with relevant procedures

Serious incidents and field safety corrective actions

According to Article 27(5) of the MDR and Article 24(5) of the IVDR, the UDI shall be used for reporting serious incidents and field safety corrective actions in accordance with Article 87 MDR and Article 82 IVDR. The organisation’s internal procedures should detail these requirements.

Purchasing controls

While components/parts of purchased components are not subject to UDI obligations unless they are regulated as medical devices in accordance with Article 23 MDR and Article 20 IVDR, a review of the purchasing procedures should be undertaken based on the following considerations:

  • Manufacturers should investigate existing purchase activities and their controls to identify materials and equipment which may have an impact on the compliance of the UDI-system. This may include label material, printer, and scanner

  • In addition, purchase activities need to be investigated to identify parts, materials and equipment which are placed on the market as a device and for which the organisation assumes the obligations incumbent on manufacturers in cases of Articles 16(1), 17(2), 22(4) or 23(2) MDR

  • Moreover, purchase of goods which are subject to UDI obligations should be identified and processed/recorded accordingly

Documentation and records

The Basic UDI-DI of the device should appear on:

  • The Vigilance and Post-Market Surveillance Reports (such as MIR and PSUR)

  • The EU Declaration of Conformity, (Annex IV MDR/IVDR)

  • The technical documentation (Annex II MDR/IVDR)

  • The Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (Article 32(2) MDR, Article 29(2) IVDR)

  • The Certificate of free sale (Article 60 MDR, Article 55 IVDR)

  • And certain types of EC Certificate, i.e. EU technical documentation assessment certificates (Annex IX MDR/IVDR), EU Type-examination certificates (Annex X MDR/IVDR) and EU product verification certificates (Annex XI MDR/IVDR). The UDI shall be included on the implant card, in accordance with Article 18 of the MDR. Internal procedures should reference the appearance of the Basic UDI in the abovementioned cases

The UDI (UDI-DI + UDI-PI) of the device should:

  • Appear on the labels or on the device itself, as applicable, and all higher levels of packaging

  • Be referenced in the technical documentation

  • While the Basic UDI-DI and UDI-DI should be provided to the UDI database in EUDAMED (Article 28, 29, Annex VI, Part B MDR/Article 25, 26, Annex VI Part B IVDR), the UDI-PI should be provided to EUDAMED only in case of vigilance issues

Enterprise Resource Planning

If the manufacturer uses an Enterprise Resource Planning system to capture the UDI data (Basic UDI-DI, UDI-DI and UDI-PI), it should maintain validation documentation for linking the operations printers’ software, collecting UDI metadata and creating the UDI, including the linear or 2D and Human Readable Indication identifiers, validating M2M connectivity to EUDAMED, and other steps.

UDI data to be provided to EUDAMED database

According to MDR and IVDR respectively, before a device is placed on the Union market, other than a custom-made, investigational or performance study device, the manufacturer should ensure that the information referred to in Part A and Part B of Annex VI MDR/IVDR relevant to the device in question is correctly submitted and transferred to the UDI database in EUDAMED. The manufacturer should keep the information submitted to EUDAMED updated.

QMS process implementing UDI at the manufacturer’s site

The following steps could be taken into account when implementing UDI specific processes into the QMS:

  1. Plan for product traceability

    While the manufacturer should refine their strategies and activities regarding traceability considering the provisions of Art. 25 and 27(8) MDR and 22 and 24(8) IVDR, some elements for consideration may include:

    • Legal requirements

    • Internal production process needs that could be impacted by the implementation of the UDI

    • Facilitation of compliance of other stakeholders (including the different logistic pathways)

    • Liability aspects

    • Patient needs

  2. UDI assignment process

    1. Manufacturers should identify systematically devices, parts, components, systems, procedure packs which require a Basic UDI-DI and UDI-DI assignment. This should include parts, materials and equipment which are placed on the market as a device and for which the organisation assumes the obligations incumbent on manufacturers in cases of Articles 16(1), 17(2), 22(4), or 32(2) MDR. This could involve collaboration with personnel in engineering, Quality and Supply Chain management, Service and Regulatory Affairs.

    2. Procedures should be in place to ensure the uniqueness of the assigned UDI.

    3. Training should be provided and documented (internally audited) to ensure that the UDI assignment is done in accordance with rules provided by the issuing entities and the legislation.

    4. The Manufacturer should review the production control method used with each device to allow one of the following production identifiers:

      • Serial Number

      • Lot Number

      • Expiration Date

      • Manufacturing Date (only required if this is the exclusive PI)

      • Software version

  3. Placing UDI Carrier and direct marking

    1. The manufacturer should define the format, specifications and location of the UDI Carrier on the label or permanent marking (if and when required on the device) in compliance with Annex VI Part C of the MDR/IVDR.

    2. The manufacturer should implement a procedure for placing the UDI Carrier on the label and if appropriate to directly mark the device.

    3. Procedures to place UDI Carriers on the label and if appropriate directly on the device, should cover the general requirements as well as those for specific device types (e.g. implantable, system or procedure packs, configurable devices, software as medical device).

    4. Durability of the UDI marking during normal use of the device and the whole lifetime of the device should be ensured.

  4. UDI linkage to applicable quality records

    Procedures should be implemented in order to ensure linkage between the UDI of medical devices and the applicable quality records. The responsible function should:

    1. Ensure link between the UDI and the device manufacturing quality records.

    2. Ensure link between the UDI in the service records.

    3. Ensure link between the UDI in the complaint records.

    4. Ensure link between the UDI in the required post market reports.

    5. Ensure link between the UDI in the trend reporting.

    6. Ensure link between the UDI and the vigilance records.

    7. Ensure link between the UDI and the reports and records of corrections and removals.

    8. Ensure link between the UDI and the medical device tracking requirements.

    Where appropriate, when a new UDI has been assigned to a device, the previous device UDI should be recorded within the quality records.

  5. UDI information in EUDAMED

    Procedures should be implemented and documented:

    1. To ensure that UDI/Device data as referred to in Annex VI, Part A, Section 2 & Part B MDR/IVDR are provided to EUDAMED.

    2. To ensure that where a change of a device affects the data attributes associated with a UDI-DI, the corresponding UDI data are updated in EUDAMED.

Example of a UDI QMS implementation plan

Note

This is meant as illustration. Manufacturers are responsible for how they incorporate these elements.

  1. Read and assess the MDR/IVDR UDI requirements. Identify additional documents such as, guidance documents from the MDCG. Documents published by the IMDRF may also be used as input.

  2. Define the roles and responsibilities with respect to legal requirements in your organisation.

  3. Define the responsibilities within your organisation and the interfaces. Make sure that all internal procedures that are affected by the UDI requirements are identified. Make sure that all affected departments are involved in the implementation process.

  4. Determine the classification of each of devices and accessories (limited to medical devices in their own right) – this will help establish when the label and packages will need to be UDI-compliant or when direct marking of the reusable device is needed.

  5. Develop an accurate stock keeping units (SKUs) list of all such devices and accessories and their packages.

  6. Determine where the device manufacturing quality records are located and who owns that data.

  7. Review current labels and packages to determine where and how UDI will be applied.

  8. Determine which type of UDI carrier will be used for the purposes of UDI – UDI carriers include, inter alia, ID/linear bar code, 2D/Matrix bar code, RFID.

  9. Develop appropriate barcode implementation strategies, including barcode verification.

  10. Select a designated issuing entity.

  11. Quality System – Review current Standard Operating Procedures and systems for the inclusion of the UDI System. New Standard Operating Procedures may need to be generated to cover all requirements.