European Commission

 

Keywords details

The keyword 'average consumer' has been found in the following documents:


UCP Directive

Article 7 2.
Whereas (18)
Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1.
Article 6 2.
Article 7 1.
Article 8 al1
Whereas (19)





EC Guidance

2.4.4. Confusing marketing
2.2.2. Case law and Guidance
2.5.6. Breaches of codes of conduct containing environmental commitments may also be considered misleading actions.
2.2.1. Provisions of the Directive
2.2. The average consumer
2.5.5. The application of the Directive's general provisions to misleading environmental claims





Cases

National ID Common name Subject Directive article Date decision Decision type
4 Ob 42/08t product origin Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1.
08/04/2008 Supreme court decision
I-878-815/2010 product characteristics Article 5 2. (a)
Article 6 1. (b)
Article 13 al1
27/05/2010 Court decision, first degree
6 U 219/09 material distortion Article 5 2.
25/03/2010 Court decision in appeal
6 U 108/07 misleading advertising Article 5 1.
Article 5 2.
Article 5 3.
29/05/2008 Court decision in appeal
Decision nr RLU nr 2/2009 misleading commercial practices Article 6 1.
Article 6 1. (b)
03/04/2009 Administrative decision, first degree
19J/2010 misleading advertising Article 5 4. (a)
Article 6 2. (a)
Article 7 1.
20/09/2010 Other
28J/2010 Optimus Telecomunicações vs. Vodafone Portugal misleading advertising Article 6 1. (a)
20/12/2010 Other
OLG Köln, Urteil v. 21.09.2012 - 6 U 14/12 OLG Köln, Urteil v. 21.09.2012 - 6 U 14/12 price Article 7 4. (c)
21/09/2012 Court decision in appeal
Decision nr 8/2010 misleading commercial practices Article 5 2.
Article 6 1.
29/07/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
AWB 09/2114 BC-T2 misleading omissions Article 3 1.
Article 7 1.
Article 7 4.
06/07/2009 Court decision, first degree
Competition Council decision No 2S-23 of 6 October 2011 cure Annex I al1 17.
06/10/2011 Administrative decision, first degree
2. Kf. 27. 045/2011/4. misleading advertising Article 5 1.
Article 5 4.
Article 7 1.
11/05/2011 Court decision in appeal
Slovak Trade Inspection, 12/07/2011 ref.code: SK/0323/99/2011 inaccurate information Article 5 1.
Article 5 2. (a)
Article 6 1. (d)
12/07/2011 Administrative decision in appeal
PS6085 "RTI - TELEVOTO GRANDE FRATELLO" misleading advertising Article 6 1. (a)
Article 6 1. (b)
07/07/2011 Administrative decision, first degree
2S-5 cure Article 2 (d)
Annex I al1 1.
Annex I al1 17.
11/02/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
4a O 160/10 misleading statements Article 5 1.
Article 6 1. (b)
16/12/2010 Court decision, first degree
PS4312 "IMMOBILDREAM-COMPLESSO RESIDENZIALE POLIS" terms & conditions Article 6 1. (b)
Article 7 1.
Article 7 4. (c)
22/12/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
2S-18 prizes Article 2 (d)
Annex I al1 1.
Annex I al1 19.
10/09/2009 Administrative decision, first degree
Court of Appeal Brussels, 4 May 2010 Court of Appeal Brussels, 4 May 2010 limitations imposed by the medium Article 7 1.
Article 7 4. (c)
04/05/2010 Court decision in appeal
11-18807 combined offers Article 5 2.
12/07/2012 Supreme court decision
8J/2010 comparative advertising Article 5 2.
Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1. (b)
21/04/2010 Other
Ombudsman of the Consumer 16th of December 2009 (Protocol No 3990) misleading omissions 16/12/2009 Other
IER 2010/60 misleading commercial practices Article 6 1.
Article 7 1.
Article 7 3.
23/03/2010 Court decision in appeal
Inšpektorát Slovenskej obchodnej inšpekcie v Banskej Bystrici, 28.07.2010 P/0221/06/10 guarantee Article 7 2.
28/07/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
President of the Commercial Court of Brussels, 30 January 2008 misleading advertising Article 6 1.
30/01/2008 Court decision, first degree
N° 08/12771 combined offers Article 5 1.
Article 5 2.
Article 5 4.
Article 7 4.
26/11/2009 Court decision in appeal
[2011] EWHC 250 (Ch) Kingspan Group Plc v Rockwool Ltd comparative advertising Article 6 2. (a)
21/02/2011 Court decision, first degree
1275/2011, VII d. misleading advertising Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1. (b)
16/06/2011 Supreme court decision
2J/2011 misleading advertising Article 6 1.
10/02/2011 Other
Administratīvās rajona tiesas spriedums lietā Nr. A420592710 misleading advertising Article 6 1. (a)
Article 6 2.
Article 7 1.
Annex I al1 20.
07/03/2012 Administrative decision, first degree
President of the Commercial Court in Brussels, 8 June 2009 misleading advertising Article 6 1.
08/06/2009 Court decision, first degree
[2011] EWHC 106 (Ch) OFT v Purely Creative Ltd prizes Article 5 1.
Article 6 1.
Article 7 1.
Annex I al2 31. -
02/02/2011 Court decision, first degree
4 U 141/11 fine print Article 7 1.
Article 7 4. (a)
13/10/2011 Court decision in appeal
10 O 102/11 KfH information requirements Article 7 1.
30/09/2011 Court decision, first degree
Athens Court of Appeal 3880/2010 financial services Article 7 1.
Article 7 4. (a)
28/03/2010 Court decision in appeal
Court of Appeal Brussels, 20 January 2009 transaction decision Article 6 1.
Article 6 1. (b)
20/01/2009 Court decision in appeal
PS6408 "MUSIC ACADEMY ITALY" misleading advertising Article 6 1. (a)
Article 6 1. (b)
25/08/2011 Administrative decision, first degree
Decision of 13 March 2008 games of chance Article 5 2.
Article 6 1.
Article 7 1.
13/03/2008 Supreme court decision
Slovak Trade Inspection, 30/11/2010 ref. code: P/0359/07/2010 misleading omissions Article 5 1.
Article 5 2. (b)
Article 7 2.
30/11/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
9J/2012 9J/2012 comparative advertising Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1. (b)
01/05/2012 Other
5J/2012 5J/2012 misleading statements Article 5 1.
Article 6 2. (b)
04/04/2012 Other
2J/2013 2J/2013 misleading statements Article 5 1.
Article 6 1. (b)
01/03/2013 Other
Decision no. RPZ 46/2012 Decision no. RPZ 46/2012 financial services Article 6 1.
Article 6 1. (a)
Article 6 1. (b)
28/12/2012 Administrative decision, first degree
Slovak Trade Inspection, 21/08/2013, ref. code: P/0155/05/13 Slovak Trade Inspection, 21/08/2013, ref. code: P/0155/05/13 consumer rights Article 6 1.
Article 7 1.
Article 7 2.
21/08/2013 Administrative decision, first degree
14 U 319/12 material information Article 7 1.
24/07/2012 Court decision in appeal
14J/2012 14J/2012 misleading statements Article 6 1. (b)
17/10/2012 Other
Prescription of the Estonian Consumer Protection Board of 16 January 2013 Bakker Holland OÜ aggressive commercial practices Annex I al2 31.
16/01/2013 Administrative decision, first degree
Ombudsman of the Consumer 27th of December 2012 (Νo of protocol 11394) investments Article 7 1.
27/12/2012 Other
13J/2013 13J/2013 misleading statements Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1. (b)
01/01/2012 Other





Legal Literature

Reference Title Author Date
Wissenschaft in Recht und Praxis (WRP), 2010, pages 677 - 686 A reaction: An interpretation of the UCP Directive from the view of the UWG (the German Unfair Competition Act)? K.-H. FEZER 2010
3(2) QRTL 7 Quarterly Review of Tort Law The Consumer Protection Act 2007 — "Enforcing The New Rules" A. SCHUSTER 2008
2005 12(5) CLP 125 The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive and the average consumer N. REILLY 2005
T.P.A. & A. 2006, 17(8), 95-96 All above board J. DAVIES 2006
L.L.R. 2005, 1(2), 317-337 The EU Unfair Commercial Practices Directive: a faltering first step C. PONCIBO and R. INCARDONA 2005
J.B.L. 2007, Jan, 16-42 Legislative Comment - European framework for unfair commercial practices: analysis of Directive 2005/29 B. DE GROOTE and K. DE VULDER 2007
Monitor Prawniczy, 23/2007, pages 1287-1292 A new Act on the Prevention of the Unfair Commercial Practices M. NAMYSŁOWSKA 2007
J.B.L. 2009, 2 183-194 The end of an era - implementing the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive in the United Kingdom: punctual criminal law gives way to a general criminal/civil law standard G. HOWELLS 2009
Adviser 2008, 128, pages 49-53 Using the New Consumer Protection Regulations A. HADLEY 2008
S.E.W. 2009, 1, pages 3-11 The average Euroconsumer- a diverse phenomenon. The UCP Directive and the case law of the Court of Justice C. VAN DAM 2009
A.W.S. 2006, 21, 32-33 The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive H. HART 2006
Η μοντέρνα φιλελεύθερη νομική κρίση στην επικοινωνία των πρακτικών προώθησης πωλήσεων (έργω διαφήμιση) σύμφωνα με τις επιταγές του κοινοτικού δικαίου, Δίκαιο Μέσων Ενημέρωσης και Επικοινωνίας 3/2007, 340-346 The modern liberal legal judgment in the communication of promotional sales practices (advertisement in practice) according to the provisions of the European Community legal framework CH.E. APOSTOLOPOULOS 2007
L.Q.R. 2005, 121, 386-389 Deep impact? The EC Directive on unfair commercial practices and domestic consumer law C. TWIGG-FLEINER 2005
Communication Commerce électronique No.11, November 2011, étude 21 The sale of a computer with pre-installed software is an unfair practice P. STOFFEL-MUNCK 2011
Justice of the Peace, 2008, vol 172, page 516-522 The Trade Descriptions Act 1968 is Dead: Long Live The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 Part 1 V. SMITH 2008
Revista de Direito das Sociedades, Ano III (2011) – Número I, Director: António Menezes Cordeiro, pages 187-219 Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices J. MORAIS CARVALHO 2011
Banca borsa tit. cred. 2011, 03, 334 The application of unfair commercial practices regulation in the credit and insurance sector. V. MELI 2011
Tijdschrift voor de Consumentenrechten en handelspraktijken, 2011, vol. 4, p.146-152 The "socially vulnerable consumer" as a victim of unfair commercial practices. N. WOUTERS 2011
Studia Prawa Prywatnego, 2011, no. 2, pages 33-70 The law on fair competition and the protection of customers in the light of the Unfair Commercial Practices Act. R. STEFANICKI 2011
Entertainment Law Review, 2011, vol 22, chapter 4, page 118 122 Office of Fair Trading v Purely Creative Ltd: the net tightens on exponents of sharp commercial practices O. BRAY and M. STARMER 2011





Other materials

N/A




Synonyms

No synonym found for this keyword