European Commission

 

Keywords details

The keyword 'misleading statements' has been found in the following documents:


UCP Directive

No Directive found for this keyword




EC Guidance

1.10.2. General considerations on the role of self regulation
2.5.5. The application of the Directive's general provisions to misleading environmental claims
2.5.2. Overview of specific EU legislation on environmental claims





Cases

National ID Common name Subject Directive article Date decision Decision type
4 Ob 42/08t product origin Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1.
08/04/2008 Supreme court decision
Consumer Rights Protection Centre Decision Nr.E03-KREUD-23 misrepresentation Article 5 4. (a)
Article 13 al1
Annex I al1 9.
15/04/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
Ombudsman of the Consumer, 9th of August 2010 (Protocol No 1752) misleading statements Article 5 4.
Article 6 1.
09/08/2010 Other
13 U 173/09 trader Article 2 (b)
Article 2 (d)
Article 6 1. (g)
09/09/2010 Court decision in appeal
312 0 74/09 Nicht-Einhaltung der Lieferfrist II - Beamer-Lampe delivery Article 6 1. (b)
Article 7 4. (d)
01/05/2009 Court decision, first degree
6 U 108/07 misleading advertising Article 5 1.
Article 5 2.
Article 5 3.
29/05/2008 Court decision in appeal
4 U 4/08 right of withdrawal Article 2 (e)
Article 2 (k)
Article 5 2. (a)
06/03/2008 Court decision in appeal
J. nr. 10/01058 endorsement Article 5 4.
Article 6 1.
01/09/2010 Other
4 Ob 174/09f unwanted solicitations Article 6 1.
Article 8 al1
Annex I al2 26.
19/01/2010 Supreme court decision
18J/2012 18J/2012 misleading advertising Article 6 1. (b)
Article 6 1. (g)
05/11/2012 Other
Slovak Trade Inspection, 29/05/2013, ref. code: P/0118/03/2013 Slovak Trade Inspection, 29/05/2013, ref. code: P/0118/03/2013 consumer rights Article 6
29/05/2013 Administrative decision, first degree
PS5292 "Granbazaar.it - consegna prodotto" internet Article 5 2. (a)
Article 6 1. (a)
Article 6 1. (b)
11/07/2012 Administrative decision, first degree
ref. code: P/0246/03/2011 terms & conditions 18/11/2011 Administrative decision, first degree
ref. code: SK/0292/99/2011 delivery 14/11/2011 Administrative decision in appeal
13076/2010, VII d. inaccurate information Article 6 1.
23/06/2011 Supreme court decision
PS7235 "FERRARELLE - IMPATTO ZERO" environmental claim Article 6 1. (b)
08/02/2012 Administrative decision, first degree
Sodba II U 353/2012 free Article 6 1. (d)
16/01/2013 Administrative decision, first degree
C-453/10 Perenič financial services Article 2 (d)
Article 6 1.
15/03/2012 Court of justice decision
Rotterdam District Court 25 July 2013, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2013:5540 Rotterdam District Court 25 July 2013, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2013:5540 guarantee Article 6 1. (g)
25/07/2013 Court decision, first degree
10/04016 10/04016 material information Article 6 1. (b)
10/05/2012 Court decision in appeal
Rotterdam District Court 23 May 2013, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2013:CA0879 Rotterdam District Court 23 May 2013, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2013:CA0879 prizes Article 6 1. (c)
Article 6 1. (d)
23/05/2013 Court decision, first degree
10/16013 10/16013 comparative advertising Article 6 2.
Article 7 1.
24/10/2012 Court decision in appeal
District Court North Holland 20 February 2013, LJN BZ1615 District Court North Holland 20 February 2013, LJN BZ1615 B2B Article 5 2. (a)
Article 6 1.
Article 7 1.
Article 8 al1
20/02/2013 Court decision, first degree
4Ob29/13p Versandapotheke für Österreich trader Article 6 1. (f)
23/05/2013 Supreme court decision
7J/2010 product characteristics Article 5 2.
Article 6 2. (b)
19/04/2010 Other
Slovak Trade Inspection, 14.01.2008 ref. code: P/411/2/2007 discounts Article 5 4.
Article 6 1. (d)
14/01/2008 Administrative decision, first degree
Slovak Trade Inspection , 7.05.2010 ref. code: P/O11O/O5/2O1O price reductions Article 5 1.
Article 5 4.
Article 6 1. (d)
07/05/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
Slovak Trade Inspection, 12.05.2008 -- ref. code: P/0062/08/08 misleading statements Article 5 1.
Article 6 1. (d)
12/05/2008 Administrative decision, first degree
Ombudsman of the Consumer 10th of October 2007 (Protocol No 1428) advertisement Article 5 4.
Article 6 1.
10/10/2007 Other
PS105 PUBBLICITÀ GIOCO DEL LOTTO SU CANALI SKY misleading advertising Annex I al1 16.
23/12/2008 Administrative decision, first degree
PS411 OVITO-MAGICANNUCCIA APPROVATI FIMP endorsement Annex I al1 4.
03/07/2008 Administrative decision, first degree
PS1174 VARIE SOCIETÀ-PRODUZIONE CASCHI PER MOTOCICLISTI trust mark Annex I al1 2.
22/12/2009 Administrative decision, first degree
Slovak Trade Inspection, 05.08.2010 -- P/0241/06/10 product characteristics Article 5 2. (b)
05/08/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
[2008] EWHC 3129 (QB) Tiscali UK Ltd v. British Telecommunications Plc professional diligence Article 5 2.
16/12/2008 Court decision, first degree
MD 2009:24 misleading statements Article 5 1.
Article 5 2.
Article 5 4. (a)
Article 6 1.
03/09/2009 Court decision in appeal
MD 2010:8 misleading statements Article 5 1.
Article 5 2.
Article 5 4. (a)
Article 6 1.
12/03/2010 Court decision in appeal
#09/00010 misleading statements Article 5 4.
Article 6 1.
20/10/2009 Court decision in appeal
Decision no. RPZ-28/2010 misleading advertising Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1. (b)
Article 7 1.
09/12/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
Court of Appeal Antwerp, 23 December 2010 intermediary Article 6 1.
23/12/2011 Court decision in appeal
LJN: BT6751 Mikro-Electro v. Consumentenautoriteit guarantee Article 6 1. (g)
05/10/2011 Administrative decision, first degree
Decision no. RGD-32/2011 right of withdrawal Article 5 2.
Article 6 1. (g)
30/12/2011 Administrative decision, first degree
KKO:2011:88 comparative advertising Article 14 3. al1 al1
27/10/2011 Supreme court decision
SH2013.V-0062-11 SH2013.V-0062-11 misleading commercial practices Article 6 1. (b)
29/10/2013 Court decision, first degree
Slovak Trade Inspection, 24/10/2013, ref. code: P/0269/05/13 consumer rights 24/10/2013 Administrative decision, first degree
J.nr.: 12/03125 J.nr.: 12/03125 misleading commercial practices Article 6 1. (b)
18/04/2013 Other
Hof van Beroep te Brussel 22 February 2011 Hof van Beroep te Brussel 22 February 2011 misleading advertising Article 6 1. (b)
22/02/2011 Court decision in appeal
Prescription of the Estonian Consumer Protection Board of 16 January 2013 Bakker Holland OÜ aggressive commercial practices Annex I al2 31.
16/01/2013 Administrative decision, first degree





Legal Literature

N/A




Other materials

N/A




Synonyms

No synonym found for this keyword