European Commission

 

Keywords details

The keyword 'false impression' has been found in the following documents:


UCP Directive

Annex I al1 9.





EC Guidance

No EC Guidance found for this keyword




Cases

National ID Common name Subject Directive article Date decision Decision type
Decision no. RPZ-30/2010 games of chance Annex I al2 31.
21/12/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
Decision no. RWR 32/2010 intimidation Article 5 2.
20/12/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
Decision no. RBG-20/2010 price information Article 5 2.
Article 5 4.
Article 6 1.
20/12/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
Prescription of the Estonian Consumer Protection Board of 16 January 2013 Bakker Holland OÜ aggressive commercial practices Annex I al2 31.
16/01/2013 Administrative decision, first degree
4 Ob 245/07v misleading omissions Article 14 3. al1 al1
28/04/2008 Supreme court decision
J. nr. 10/01058 endorsement Article 5 4.
Article 6 1.
01/09/2010 Other
17 Ob 14/10y labelling Article 6 2. (a)
Annex I al1 13.
16/02/2011 Supreme court decision
Ombudsman of the Consumer, 9th of August 2010 (Protocol No 1752) misleading statements Article 5 4.
Article 6 1.
09/08/2010 Other
1 O 2937/10 attributes of the trader Article 6 1.
22/12/2010 Court decision, first degree
2008/AR/666 comparative advertising Article 6 2.
Article 6 2. (a)
12/04/2010 Court decision in appeal
Ombudsman of the Consumer 10th of March 2011 (Νo of protocol 2532) misleading advertising Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1. (b)
Article 7 1.
Article 7 4. (c)
10/03/2011 Other
Vj/127-030/2009 black list Annex I al1 16.
Annex I al1 20.
Annex I al2 31.
12/05/2011 Administrative decision in appeal
CA/NB/544/10 Consumer Authority, 21 September 2010, Garant-o-Matic B.V. misleading commercial practices Article 6 1. (b)
Article 6 1. (d)
Article 6 2. (b)
Article 7 4. (a)
Annex I al1 20.
Annex I al2 31. -
21/09/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
4 Ob 228/10y average consumer Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1. (b)
15/02/2011 Supreme court decision
Decision no. RWR-12/2011 misleading commercial practices Article 5 2.
Article 7 1.
01/07/2011 Administrative decision, first degree
2S-12 authorisation Article 2 (d)
Article 6 1.
Annex I al1 1.
Annex I al1 9.
07/05/2009 Administrative decision, first degree
2S-18 prizes Article 2 (d)
Annex I al1 1.
Annex I al1 19.
10/09/2009 Administrative decision, first degree
2S-17 cure Article 2 (d)
Annex I al1 1.
Annex I al1 17.
04/07/2011 Administrative decision, first degree
Decision nr RLU nr 2/2009 misleading commercial practices Article 6 1.
Article 6 1. (b)
03/04/2009 Administrative decision, first degree
Administratīvās rajona tiesas spriedums lietā Nr. A42774708 misleading advertising Article 13 al1
Annex I al1 5.
21/07/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
Slovak Trade Inspection , 7.05.2010 ref. code: P/O11O/O5/2O1O price reductions Article 5 1.
Article 5 4.
Article 6 1. (d)
07/05/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
IER 2010/60 misleading commercial practices Article 6 1.
Article 7 1.
Article 7 3.
23/03/2010 Court decision in appeal
[2008] EWHC 3129 (QB) Tiscali UK Ltd v. British Telecommunications Plc professional diligence Article 5 2.
16/12/2008 Court decision, first degree
11724/2010, VII d. labelling Article 6 1. (b)
Article 6 2. (a)
14/06/2011 Supreme court decision
1275/2011, VII d. misleading advertising Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1. (b)
16/06/2011 Supreme court decision
PS989 "AUTHOS-OPERAZIONE IDEA FORD" misleading advertising Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1. (d)
Article 7 2.
Article 7 4.
25/02/2010 Administrative decision, first degree
PS513 "OPODO-SERVIZI DI AGENZIA TURISTICA ON LINE" bait and switch Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1. (a)
Article 6 1. (d)
Article 7 1.
Article 7 4. (c)
Annex I al1 6.
16/02/2011 Administrative decision, first degree
Vj-60/2011/45. advertorial Article 7 1.
Annex I al1 11.
09/01/2012 Administrative decision, first degree
Decision no. DDK 1/2012 misleading commercial practices Article 6 1. (b)
Article 7 1.
12/01/2012 Administrative decision, first degree
Decision no. DDK-2/2013 Decision no. DDK-2/2013 misleading commercial practices Article 6 1. (c)
02/05/2013 Administrative decision, first degree
Decision no. RWA-14/2013 Decision no. RWA-14/2013 misleading commercial practices Article 6 1. (d)
03/09/2013 Administrative decision, first degree
H.D. 288/2009 and 289/2009 (or U 2012.1089H) H.D. 288/2009 and 289/2009 (or U 2012.1089H) misleading commercial practices
06/01/2012 Supreme court decision
SH2013.V-0062-11 SH2013.V-0062-11 misleading commercial practices Article 6 1. (b)
29/10/2013 Court decision, first degree
SH2013.V-0073-11 (or U 2013.2396S) SH2013.V-0073-11 (or U 2013.2396S) misleading commercial practices Article 6 1. (b)
27/05/2013 Court decision, first degree
J.nr.: 12/03125 J.nr.: 12/03125 misleading commercial practices Article 6 1. (b)
18/04/2013 Other





Legal Literature

Reference Title Author Date
Aranzadi Civil-Mercantil Núm. 3/2011. Pamplona 2011. Denigration as illicit competing practice after reformation of the unfair competition and advertising legal regime. R. LARA GONZÁLEZ 2011





Other materials

N/A




Synonyms

No synonym found for this keyword