Legal Literature detailB a c k
Article 5 2. (a)
Article 5 4. (a)
Article 5 4. (b)
Article 5 5.
|Reference||Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (GRUR) 2010, pages 767-776|
|Country||Germany||Legal Literature date||2010|
|Author||H. KÖHLER||Author initial|
|Title DE||Neujustierung des UWG am Beispiel der Verkaufsförderungsmaßnahmen||URL DE||N/A|
|Title EN||Readjustment of the Unfair Competition Act based on the example of consumer promotion actions||URL EN||N/A|
|Keywords||black list, general discussion, unfair competition|
The author comes to the conclusion that the UWG (the German Unfair Competition Act) has to be interpreted in compliance with the UCP Directive in such way that commercial practices vis-à-vis consumers undergo a three-step test of unfairness.
(1) In the first step, one has to examine whether the respective behaviour is covered by the "black list" in the sense of the annex to Sec. 3 III UWG.
(2) In a second step, it has to be assessed whether the behaviour constitutes a misleading commercial practice according to § 5 UWG, an omission of information (§ 5a II-IV UWG and § 4 Nr. 4 and 5 UWG) or an inappropriate influence (§ 4 Nr. 1 und 2 UWG).
(3) In a third step, it has to be assessed whether or not the behaviour falls within the scope of the blanket clause of § 3 II 1 UWG.
This examination procedure applies also to sales promotions.