Case detailB a c k
Article 2 (e)
Article 7 1.
Article 7 5.
|National ID||I-4 U 192/07, 4 U 192/07|
|Common name||Decision type||Court decision in appeal|
|Court||Oberlandesgericht - OLG (Hamm)||Plaintiff(s)|
|Court translation||Higher Regional Court (Hamm)||Defendant(s)|
|Keywords||identity of the trader, material distortion, misleading omissions|
+ Expand all
The complete absence of any reference to the company register and the company registration number on a website constitutes an unfair commercial practice. This can no longer be regarded as a bagatelle under unfair competition legislation since the UCP Directive came into force, in particular when it is difficult for a consumer to independently obtain information about the company.
An internet service provider did not reveal any information on its website regarding the commercial register where its company was registered, nor about its company registration number.
The internet service provider was organised as a "Limited" type of company, for which consumers cannot obtain any information from an independent body.
The plaintiff requested to cease and desist this commercial practice.
Does the failure to communicate the company register and the company registration number data constitute an unfair commercial practice?
The court found that, since the UCP Directive came into force, the German Unfair Competition Act (UWG) has to be interpreted in the light of the UCP Directive.
According to the first draft of the new UWG of the German ministry of justice, Sec. 3, para. 2, 2nd sentence UWG holds that a commercial practice must noticeably impair the economic behaviour of consumers in order to be prohibited. This will be the case when a consumer protection provision of a European Directive or European Regulation would be violated in such a way that obligatory information duties are infringed. According to the court, such information duty also includes the requirement to convey the company registration number, as set forth by article 5 of the eCommerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and implemented by Sec. 5 of the German Telemedia Act. Therefore, according to the court, the absence of such information constitutes a violation of §3 UWG.
|URL Decision||Decision full text|
The plaintiff's request was granted.
|There is no events for this case.|
|National ID||Common Name||Subject||Country||Link type|
|There is no related cases for this case.|
|There is no Legal Literature for this case.|