Case detailB a c k
Article 5 2. (a)
Article 5 2. (b)
Article 6 1.
|Common name||"AUTOSTRADE PER L''ITALIA-INFORMAZIONI SULLA VIABILITÀ IN CONDIZIONI CRITICHE"||Decision type||Administrative decision, first degree|
|Court||Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (Rome)||Plaintiff(s)|
|Court translation||Italian Competition Authority||Defendant(s)||Autostrade per l’Italia S.p.A.|
|Keywords||inaccurate information, information obligation, informed choice, informed decision, material information, professional diligence|
+ Expand all
The omission of a trader, competent to manage a national transport infrastructure, to provide sufficient information to the users of such infrastructure during emergency situations caused by extreme weather conditions, constitutes an unfair commercial practice.
Following several consumer claims, the Italian Competition Authority decided on 23 December 2010 to launch an investigation against the defendant, a company managing the Italian motorways network.
According to the complaints, the defendant did not give information correctly and promptly to consumers who, after intense snowfalls, were blocked on the motorway for more than a day (some for up to 30 hours between 17 and 18 December 2010) in the area of Florence (Milano/Napoli).
As appeared through the course of the investigations, consumers were left in extreme climate conditions and complete isolation. Moreover, they were unable to get in contact by telephone with the defendant to get information on the traffic conditions or ask for help.
Due to the lack of information, motorway users were not given useful guidance on possible solutions, such as leaving the motorway, interrupting the journey or using alternative routes. The variable message panels, i.e. panels on the motorway electronically indicating traffic information, passed inconsistent messages on the real extent and causes of the block (snow and traffic jams). In addition, the radio station broadcasting traffic information, Isoradio, was also not providing adequate information.
Does the omission of a trader, competent to manage a national transport infrastructure, to provide sufficient information to the users of such infrastructure during emergency situations caused by extreme weather conditions, constitute an unfair commercial practice?
The Italian Competition Authority stated that the behavior of defendant constitutes an unfair commercial practice since, in lack of sufficient information on traffic information which is the defendant's task, consumers could not take informed decisions. In particular, being completely unaware of the extent of the on-going block, motorway users were induced to continue their journey or even subsequently join the motorway.
In addition, the Italian Competition Authority considered that the measures adopted by the defendant in order to solve the problems caused by the block (such as the removal of obstacles on the motorways) were insufficient and not implemented in a timely manner.
|URL Decision||Decision full text|
The Italian Competition Authority decided to fine the defendant with 350.000 Euro.
|There is no events for this case.|
|National ID||Common Name||Subject||Country||Link type|
|There is no related cases for this case.|
|There is no Legal Literature for this case.|