European Commission


Case detail

B a c k

Directive article Article 1
Article 2
Article 3 1.
Article 4
Article 5
Article 6
National ID C-261/07 and C-299/07 (joined judgement)
Country EU level Decision date 23/04/2010
Common name Total Belgium Decision type Court of justice decision
Court Court of Justice of the EU Plaintiff(s) VTB-VAB NV (C-261/07) and Galatea BVBA (C-299/07)
Court translation Court of Justice of the EU Defendant(s) Total Belgium NV (C-261/07) and Sanoma Magazines Belgium NV (C-299/07)
Subject Scope of the UCP Directive – Full harmonisation
Keywords combined offersfull harmonisation

+ Expand all


The UCP Directive undertakes a full harmonisation of unfair commercial practices. Member States are not allowed to adopt stricter rules, even in order to achieve a higher level of consumer protection. Hence, only those practices that are expressly listed as "unfair in all circumstances" can be generally prohibited by the Member States.

Combined offers are not listed by the UCP Directive as being "unfair in all circumstances". Accordingly, they cannot be prohibited per se by the Member States.


C-261/07: The defendant offered free car breakdown services for a period of three weeks to selected consumers who purchased a certain quantity of fuel. The plaintiff (a company operating in the car breakdown-service sector), brought an action before the Antwerp Commercial Court against this practice, which it found to breach the combined offer prohibition (as set forth by the then-current version of the Belgian Consumer Protection Act). 

C-299/07: The defendant publishes various magazines on the Belgian market. In one of its magazines targeted at women, it offered vouchers for a discount of 15-25% in certain lingerie shops. The plaintiff (a Belgian lingerie shop), argued that the vouchers breach the combined offer prohibition. 

Both cases were sent to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling. 

Legal issue

Does the UCP Directive preclude the existence of a national rule that prohibits commercial practices other than those classified by the UCP Directive as practices qualifying as unfair "in all circumstances"?


The UCP Directive undertakes a full harmonisation at Community level, meaning that Member States may not adopt stricter rules than those provided in the Directive. Consequently, Member States may not impose any prohibition in principle on commercial practices other than those classified by the UCP Directive as practices regarded as unfair "in all circumstances".

  URL Decision Decision full text
EN Click here


A national rule that imposes a per se prohibition (irrespective of any verification of their actual unfair nature) on combined offers, contravenes the UCP Directive.

Following this judgment, Belgium has repealed the prohibition on combined offers (Law of 6 April 2010 on market practices and consumer protection).

Additional information

Date Description URL
There is no events for this case.

Related case(s)

National ID Common Name Subject Country Link type
There is no related cases for this case.

Legal Literature