Article 6 1. (b)
||National ID||General Secretary for the Consumer, press release dated 8th of March 2011|
|Common name||Decision type||Other|
|Court||Γενική Γραμματεία Καταναλωτή||Plaintiff(s)|
|Court translation||General Secretary for the Consumer||Defendant(s)||1."MAX SECURITY” K.LEVENTIS – A.DIAMANTENIA O.E. 2. VELLIOS ATH.- FOTIOU MAR. O.E (ALPHA TEAM O.E.) 3. KOKKALAS EUSTRATIOS 4. MAREX SOLUTIONS A.E. 5. TELEPRIME A.E. 6. “NEW TECHNOLOGIES” EYSTATHIOS TATOLAS 7. “VIPER ENERGY” DIONYSIOS MILESIS|
|Keywords||advertisement, false information, misleading advertising|
+ Expand all
Making use of false claims in advertisements for electrical devices by stating that the use of such devices will lead to limited energy consumption and reduced electricity bills, is a misleading commercial practice.
Does a reference in advertisements for electrical devices to limited energy consumption and reduced electricity bills constitute a misleading commercial practice, when it is established that there is no such limitation nor reduction?
It was held that the claims used by the traders for the promotion of these devices (i.e. limited energy consumption and reduced electricity bills) constituted unfair commercial practices.
|URL Decision||Decision full text|
|There is no events for this case.|
|National ID||Common Name||Subject||Country||Link type|
|There is no related cases for this case.|
|There is no Legal Literature for this case.|