European Commission

 

Case detail



Directive article Article 5 2.
Article 6 1.
National ID Decision nr 8/2010
Country Poland Decision date 29/07/2010
Common name Decision type Administrative decision, first degree
Court Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów w Warszawie Plaintiff(s) The President of Competition and Consumer Protection
Court translation The Office of Competition and Consumer Protection in Warsaw Defendant(s) Bank BPH S.A. (Cracow)
Subject misleading commercial practices
Keywords average consumereconomic behaviourfinancial servicesmaterial distortionmisleading commercial practicestransactional decision

+ Expand all

Headnote

It is a misleading omission to advertise a fixed-term savings deposit without mentioning that the interest rate is actually variable. 

Facts

The object of the proceedings was the promotional campaign of defendant (a bank), encouraging actual and potential clients of the bank to take advantage of the offer "Przyjaźń procentuje" ("Friendship pays off") for fixed-term savings deposits.

From 17 November to 19 December 2009, the defendant published materials in the form of brochures, labelled "Recommendation Certificates".

The President of the Office of the Competition and Consumer started proceedings, as the trader was misleading the consumer, because the brochures did not state that the terms of the offer (including the interest rate for the deposits) were subject to modification.

Legal issue

Is it unfair to promote a fixed-term savings deposit, without indicating that the interest rate is actually subject to change? 

Decision

The President of the Office of the Competition and Consumer Protection considered that the brochures created the impression that the interest rates were invariable, while this was in fact not the case. In the opinion of the President, the brochure distorts (or is likely to distort) the economic behaviour of the average consumer.

  URL Decision Decision full text
EN N/A
PL http://www.bph.pl/res/docs/decyzja_uokik.pdf

Result

The practice of the defendant was found to be unfair. 

The President of the Office ordered to publish the administrative decision, not only on the defendant's website, but also in the first five pages of a nationwide journal.

Additional information

Date Description URL
There is no events for this case.

Related case(s)

National ID Common Name Subject Country Link type
There is no related cases for this case.

Legal Literature

Title Author
There is no Legal Literature for this case.