|Directive article||National ID||Cour de Cassation, première chambre civile, N° 05-20176|
|Common name||Decision type||Supreme court decision|
|Court||Cour de Cassation, première chambre civile||Plaintiff(s)||Mrs. BETTON|
|Court translation||Supreme Court, civil section N° 1||Defendant(s)||Caisse de Crédit Mutuel de Saint-Marcellin|
|Keywords||Consumer Credit Directive, enforcement, financial services|
+ Expand all
A court is entitled to automatically enforce the violation of consumer-protection provisions, even though no party to the case requested such enforcement.
A French bank granted a loan in the amount of 23.000 EUR to an individual whose bank account was overdrawn (i.e., had a negative balance). The borrower did not repay the loan. In respect of the overdrawn bank account, the bank did not make a credit offer that complied with the requirements of the French Consumer Code, even though the bank account had been overdrawn for more than three months (it being specified that under French law an overdraft constitutes a loan, which must comply with the requirement provided in the Consumer Code when such overdraft exceeds three months).
Can a court apply a provision of the French Consumer Code without any party invoking such application?
Under article L. 141-4 of the French Consumer Code, a court is entitled to automatically enforce the provisions of the Consumer Code, even when no party to the case requested such enforcement.
|URL Decision||Decision full text|
The bank was barred from receiving interest.
|There is no events for this case.|
|National ID||Common Name||Subject||Country||Link type|
|There is no related cases for this case.|
|There is no Legal Literature for this case.|